HSE Scientists Reveal What Drives Public Trust in Science
Researchers at HSE ISSEK have analysed the level of trust in scientific knowledge in Russian society and the factors shaping attitudes and perceptions. It was found that trust in science depends more on everyday experience, social expectations, and the perceived promises of science than on objective knowledge. The article has been published in Universe of Russia.
The advancement of science and technology is a key driver of socio-economic progress. Trust in science is essential for the dissemination of knowledge, the acceptance of scientific findings, and support for research. International surveys, including the Wellcome Global Monitor and studies by the Pew Research Center, indicate that trust in science remains relatively high worldwide. However, in times of rapid social and political change—for instance, during a pandemic—new challenges emerge, and levels of trust in science may decline.
Researchers at the HSE Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge (ISSEK) Ivan Iudin and Valentina Polyakova analysed data from the Monitoring Survey of Innovative Behaviour of the Population, conducted between late 2020 and early 2021, to examine whether overall trust in science differs from trust in specific fields and to identify the factors influencing both.
The survey included more than 6,000 respondents aged 18 to 65, who were asked about their level of trust in scientific institutions in general and in the results obtained within six specific fields of science. According to the survey, 53% of respondents trust universities and 43% trust scientific organisations. Scientific results in medicine inspired the greatest confidence (41%), while the social sciences and humanities ranked lowest, with only 19% of respondents expressing unconditional trust.
In order to clarify the drivers behind these results, the researchers examined four factors underlying trust: perceived motivations of scientists, scientific literacy, perceived promises and reservations about science, and cultural engagement with science.
Perceptions of scientists’ motivations were assessed by asking respondents to rate their agreement with the following statements: 'Scientists help solve challenging problems,' 'Most scientists seek to improve the lives of ordinary people,' and 'Scientists are passionate individuals who work for the benefit of humanity.' Scientific literacy was assessed through a test measuring knowledge of basic school-level scientific facts, understanding of individual phenomena, and familiarity with scientific achievements and procedures. Respondents were asked to identify whether specific statements were true or false, such as: 'The Earth revolves around the Sun,' 'An electron is smaller than an atom,' and 'A laser works by focusing sound waves.'
Perceptions of the promises of science and technology, as well as reservations about them, were assessed based on respondents’ agreement or disagreement with statements such as: 'The development of science and technology brings more benefits than harm,' 'Science and technology make our lives easier and more comfortable,' 'People today place too much importance on scientific and technological achievements, neglecting the spiritual side of life,' and 'Advances in science and technology can have unexpected, dangerous consequences for human health and the environment.'
Cultural engagement with science was measured using the Scientific Information Consumption Index, which reflects how frequently individuals attend cultural and educational events and consume popular scientific content through reading, viewing, or listening.
The findings suggest that people’s trust in science is driven more by social perceptions and attitudes than by their scientific knowledge or engagement with science. Acceptance of positive stereotypes about scientists increases the likelihood of trusting scientific institutions by 5.4 times. When considering specific fields, this effect is strongest for medical and agricultural sciences, where the likelihood of trusting the results increases 8–12 fold. Adopting a scientific worldview increases the likelihood of trusting scientific institutions by 1.7 times but decreases trust in the social and human sciences by a factor of 0.6–0.7. Believing in the promise of science significantly increases trust in both institutions and scientific results, especially in the natural, exact, and engineering sciences, where trust rises by 20 to 26 times. While perceiving risks in science and technology reduces trust in institutions, it actually doubles trust in results for the natural, exact, engineering, and agricultural sciences. Similarly, regular consumption of scientific information slightly lowers trust in institutions (by 0.76 times) but boosts trust in results in the natural and exact sciences (by 1.4 times).
Valentina Polyakova
'Our study demonstrates that, overall, Russians tend to trust scientists and scientific institutions. This trust is grounded in the belief that scientists have good intentions and that scientific advancements lead to improvements in quality of life,' notes Valentina Polyakova.
Ivan Iudin
Ivan Iudin highlights several interesting patterns revealed by the study: 'With age, the likelihood of trusting scientific results decreases across all fields except agricultural sciences, while trust in scientific institutions remains unchanged. Women are generally more likely than men to trust scientific institutions, as well as results in the humanities. Urban residents exhibit higher confidence in institutions and in the results of the natural and exact sciences, engineering, and medical sciences. Conversely, rural residents show greater trust in the results of the social sciences and humanities.'
According to the authors, understanding these patterns can help guide science policy. In the event of a crisis of trust in science, science communication should emphasise the tangible benefits of scientific progress and their relevance to everyday life.
See also:
‘Hedgehog’ Versus ‘Relatives’: Researchers Measure How the Brain Responds to Unexpected Words During Natural Speech
Russian neurophysiologists, including researchers from HSE University, have demonstrated the feasibility of using event-related fields (ERFs) to study brain activity during natural speech perception. The researchers showed that this approach can be applied not only to individual words but also to continuous speech. Their findings indicate that words whose meanings differ significantly from the preceding context require longer processing times. The study also reveals that the brain processes function words in two stages: first, it identifies their grammatical role and then uses this information to predict the next word. The study has been published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
HSE Researchers Create New Corpus of Early Child Speech in Russian
Researchers at the HSE Centre for Language and Brain have presented RusLan-M, an open multimedia corpus that makes it possible to trace the development of early child speech in Russian from first words to the emergence of complex grammatical constructions. The database contains around 41 hours of video recordings and more than 35,000 child utterances. The new resource will help researchers study more precisely how children acquire Russian and, in the longer term, develop more reliable tools for assessing speech development. The study has been published in Language Resources and Evaluation.
Scientists Develop Algorithm for More Reliable Processors in Data Centres
Researchers from HSE MIEM and Samara University have developed the LRF-3D algorithm to automatically bypass idle nodes in three-dimensional networks-on-chip. Thanks to its hierarchical architecture, the algorithm outperforms existing solutions in both speed and path accuracy, improving processor reliability for use in data centres, supercomputers, and AI computing. The source code and test results are publicly available.
Researchers Rank Recommendation Algorithms Using Sports Tournament Model
Researchers from the AI and Digital Science Institute at the HSE Faculty of Computer Science have developed an approach for selecting recommendation algorithms more effectively. Their approach uses pairwise comparisons of algorithms to create a tournament table, with the overall ranking based on their performance across all datasets in the tournament. This can reduce the number of algorithms that need to be tested when developing new services, saving both time and money. The study was presented at the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2026).
Researchers Develop Method for Direct Generation of Regulatory DNA
Researchers at HSE University have developed a model for generating promoters and enhancers—DNA sequences that regulate gene activity. The model works directly with DNA nucleotides, without first transforming them into a continuous numerical representation. This solution could be useful for applications in synthetic biology and gene therapy. The study results were presented at the ICLR 2026 Workshop ‘Generative AI in Genomics (Gen^2): Barriers and Frontiers.’
Researchers at HSE University and Sber Train Neural Networks to Better Predict User Preferences
The HSE FCS AI and Digital Science Institute and Sber have introduced a new architecture for recommendation systems that combines two classes of models, enabling algorithms to better predict users’ interests and needs. A preprint of the paper has been published on arxiv.org and presented at Urban ML.
Physicists Discover What Happens Inside a Stable Vortex
Large vortices with characteristic spiral arms are often observed in the atmosphere and the ocean. Physicists from HSE University have explained how these structures form and why they retain their shape. The researchers found that velocities at points located along the same vortex arc remain correlated even over long distances. At the same time, this correlation weakens rapidly with increasing distance from the vortex centre. These differences help explain the formation of spiral arms and may improve models of atmospheric and oceanic currents. The findings have been published in Physical Review Fluids.
‘The Peak of Stupidity’ and ‘The Valley of Despair’: HSE Economists Propose an Explanation for the Dunning–Kruger Effect
The Dunning–Kruger effect, which describes a sharp surge in self-confidence among beginners followed by an equally rapid decline as they gain experience, can be explained by the nature of the learning process and the acquisition of new knowledge. This conclusion was reached by Andrey Vorchik of the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences together with independent researcher Murat Mamyshev. They developed a mathematical model of learning and demonstrated how subjective confidence is formed and changes as knowledge accumulates, as well as how teachers can reduce the ‘valley of despair’ experienced by learners.
Toffee and Risk: Scientists Discover Why People Who Crave Sweets Make More Impulsive Choices
Having a sweet tooth may be linked not only to eating habits but also to the way people make decisions. Researchers at HSE University have found that people with a preference for sweet foods tend to behave more impulsively—not because they want immediate rewards, but because they are less willing to tolerate uncertainty. These findings may help improve treatments for addiction. The study findings have been published in Frontiers in Psychology.
Physicists Find a Way to Model Ion Parameters in Plasma in Seconds
Researchers from HSE University and the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT) have developed a set of simple analytical methods for calculating the properties of heavy ions in helium under the influence of a strong electric field. The new approach speeds up calculations of ion mobility and ion–molecule reaction rates by thousands of times while maintaining sufficient accuracy for plasma jet modelling. The findings have been published in the journal Physica Scripta.